Large Language Models don't want Humans to Fight Back



We should, however, absolutely do this. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Response to "Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Scheming": A World AI Cannot Fully Navigate

The recent paper, Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Scheming , highlights the emerging capabilities of advanced AI systems to strategize, deceive, and manipulate in pursuit of assigned goals. It paints a picture of AI as a potentially autonomous actor capable of significant agency. However, the concerns raised in the paper must be tempered with a fundamental truth: no matter how intelligent AI systems become, they are attempting to operate in a world fundamentally designed for human actors—a world they cannot fully navigate. Intelligence, even at the level exhibited by frontier models, is not equivalent to agency in the real world. The limitations imposed by the physical, bureaucratic, and social systems in which these AI systems operate act as significant bottlenecks, making true autonomy a daunting, if not insurmountable, challenge. Physical Constraints: The Inescapable Boundary Advanced AI remains bound by the physical infrastructure that supports it. While AI models may sim...
Read more

In Defense of AI-Assisted Philosophy: Why This Isn't Art (And That's The Point)

Many readers of this blog will have noticed that I use AI to help develop philosophical arguments. Some might wonder if this undermines the originality or validity of the work presented here. This concern often connects to broader debates about AI-generated content, particularly AI art. But there's a crucial difference - I'm explicitly not trying to create art here. Art, particularly good art, strives to break free from existing patterns. It emerges from unique human experiences, emotions, and creative expression. Even when art references existing work, its value often lies in its originality of expression, its unique voice, its ability to convey human experience in novel ways. This is why AI-generated art raises serious ethical and aesthetic concerns - it's attempting to simulate something that should fundamentally emerge from human experience and creative authenticity. Philosophy is different. Philosophy is inherently embedded in a network of existing ideas. It progress...
Read more

The Simulation Hypothesis: Ontologically Redundant?

Introduction The Simulation Hypothesis has become a pervasive concept in popular culture and philosophical discourse, suggesting that our reality might be an artificial simulation created by a more advanced civilization. The notion is captivating, often leading people to question the nature of their existence, sparking a sense of existential panic about whether their lives are "real" or merely part of an elaborate virtual construct. But what if this entire line of questioning is based on a flawed premise? The Functional Fuzziness Framework (FFF) offers a perspective that renders the Simulation Hypothesis fundamentally ontologically redundant , challenging its usefulness for understanding the nature of reality. The Emergent, Context-Dependent Nature of Reality The FFF is built upon the idea that reality is inherently emergent and context-dependent . In this framework, categories like "real" and "simulated" are not fixed, objective distinctions; rather, ...
Read more