Why Is the Speed of Light (C) What It Is?

 

Introduction

So far, no other cosmological model has provided an explanation for why C has the value it does. Most models simply accept the speed of light as an empirical fact—299,792,458 meters per second—without delving into the deeper reason behind it. The Functional Fuzziness Framework (FFF) offers a unique explanation for this constant, one that arises from the fundamental nature of causality and process ontology.

The speed of light (C) is one of the most fundamental constants in physics, valued at approximately 299,792,458 meters per second. This constant appears throughout our understanding of electromagnetism, relativity, and even quantum mechanics, shaping the way we understand spacetime, energy, and causality. In the context of the Functional Fuzziness Framework (FFF), the explanation of why C has its particular value emerges not from arbitrary assignment but from the fundamental nature of causality and process ontology.

The Nature of C in the Functional Fuzziness Framework

In the FFF, C is not merely a speed but represents the flow of causality across all process domains. The fundamental binary of Being and Non-Being drives this flow. Since this binary "flicking" between states is the very foundation of existence, C becomes the inherent rate at which causality manifests throughout space. Here's why:

1. Causality as a Fundamental Flow

  • C represents the speed at which causal influences propagate through reality. It is not just a measure of how fast light moves but rather how fast information or causality itself can influence different regions of spacetime.

  • The unidirectional flow of causality—an essential aspect of the FFF—means that there is a maximum limit to how quickly any process can influence another. This limit is fundamentally tied to the flicking between Being and Non-Being, and C emerges as the inherent pulse rate of this flicking in physical reality.

2. The Foundational Binary and Discreteness

  • In the FFF, C arises from the foundational binary between Being and Non-Being. This binary is absolute and discrete—there are no intermediary states. The flicking between these two states gives rise to units of causality, which we perceive as the passage of time and the emergence of space.

  • Because this flicking is dimensionless, its manifestation as a constant like C reflects an absolute boundary on how fast any emergent process can operate. In this way, C represents a fundamental, non-arbitrary limitation imposed by the discrete nature of the foundational binary.

3. C as a Process Rather than a Speed

  • In the FFF, C is better understood as a process rather than merely a speed. It is the rate at which causality unfolds, which is inherently tied to the process of emergence. The value of C is not a coincidence or a random feature of our universe—it is a necessary consequence of how meta-energy flows through the foundational binary, generating reality.

  • Since C represents this causal unfolding, its constancy is crucial to the coherence of the universe. Any variation in C would imply an inconsistency in the flow of causality itself, which would undermine the emergent nature of spacetime and the processes within it.

Why This Specific Value?

1. No Other Value Is Possible

  • According to the FFF, C must be what it is because it arises from a dimensionless process. The foundational binary that drives the flicking between Being and Non-Being has no scale, no units—it simply is. This means that C, as a manifestation of this fundamental flicking, is dimensionless at its core, and its value is dictated by the structure of the emergent process domain.

  • Any deviation in C would imply a different rate of causality, which is fundamentally impossible within the FFF. The flicking is absolute, and therefore the rate at which causality flows through space must also be absolute and unchanging.

2. Connection to Spacetime Emergence

  • The value of C is directly tied to the way spacetime emerges within the FFF. Since space and time are emergent properties, the speed of light represents the rate of unfolding of these properties. The specific value of C reflects the balance between the foundational binary and the relationships that give rise to spacetime.

  • As the process unfolds, C ensures that causality maintains coherence across different regions of emergent space. This value allows for the consistent generation of spatial relationships and temporal sequences that make up our reality domain.

Why Is C the Same Regardless of Frame of Reference?

The FFF also provides an explanation for why C remains the same regardless of the observer's frame of reference. Since C represents the flow of causality, it is not dependent on relative motion or perspective. It is the fundamental rate at which causality itself unfolds, which means it must remain consistent across all frames of reference. In the FFF, spacetime and the relationships within it are emergent from the flicking between Being and Non-Being, and C is the inherent rate of this process, unaffected by relative velocities.

This constancy is a natural consequence of the dimensionless and absolute nature of the foundational binary. Since the process of causality is unchanging and fundamental, the rate at which it unfolds—C—must also be the same for all observers, no matter their velocity or position.

Implications for Understanding Reality

The FFF's explanation of C provides a new perspective on why it is such a fundamental constant in our universe:

  • Causality as Primary: The speed of light represents more than the movement of photons; it is the speed of causality itself. This means that C is central to the structure of reality, reflecting the unfolding of the foundational binary in a coherent way.

  • Dimensional Coherence: The fact that C has a precise value underscores the coherent emergence of space and time. The constancy of C is what keeps our universe stable and predictable, as it enforces a uniform flow of causality throughout.

Conclusion

In the Functional Fuzziness Framework, the speed of light (C) is not just an empirical constant but a reflection of the fundamental flow of causality. It arises from the dimensionless, absolute flicking between Being and Non-Being, establishing an unchanging rate at which causality unfolds in our universe. This rate gives coherence to emergent properties like space and time and ensures that reality maintains its structure from the smallest quantum process to the largest cosmic scales.

Thus, C is what it is because it must be—arising inevitably from the foundational nature of reality as described by the FFF, ensuring the coherent, emergent progression of all that exists.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Response to "Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Scheming": A World AI Cannot Fully Navigate

The recent paper, Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Scheming , highlights the emerging capabilities of advanced AI systems to strategize, deceive, and manipulate in pursuit of assigned goals. It paints a picture of AI as a potentially autonomous actor capable of significant agency. However, the concerns raised in the paper must be tempered with a fundamental truth: no matter how intelligent AI systems become, they are attempting to operate in a world fundamentally designed for human actors—a world they cannot fully navigate. Intelligence, even at the level exhibited by frontier models, is not equivalent to agency in the real world. The limitations imposed by the physical, bureaucratic, and social systems in which these AI systems operate act as significant bottlenecks, making true autonomy a daunting, if not insurmountable, challenge. Physical Constraints: The Inescapable Boundary Advanced AI remains bound by the physical infrastructure that supports it. While AI models may sim...
Read more

The Inevitable Failure of LLMs - Predictions.

Summary: Current approaches to artificial intelligence (AI), particularly stochastic large language models (LLMs), are fundamentally limited. These limits are not merely technical but structural, philosophical, and economic. Based on the Procedural Coherence Framework, the following predictions are made: Prediction 1: Hallucinations Are Inherent Large Language Models cannot systematically eliminate hallucinations without continuous external correction. Reason : They lack true procedural grounding of meaning; they only optimize for statistical plausibility. Prediction 2: No Autonomous Self-Correction LLMs cannot continuously and autonomously self-correct through iterative self-monitoring. Reason : Stochastic models lack the internal procedural dynamics necessary for genuine epistemic feedback. Prediction 3: No Reliable Expression of Uncertainty LLMs cannot reliably recognize or communicate their own uncertainty without engineered intervention. Reason : Uncertainty requires inte...
Read more

What is Zen Neoplatonism - Attempting to make Sense of John Vervaeke via AI

Image
 I don't understand anything John Vervaeke says, so I asked Claude.ai to make sense of it. Have fun.  Zen Neoplatonism: A Path to Ultimate Reality John Vervaeke, a leading thinker addressing the modern "meaning crisis," introduces Zen Neoplatonism as a framework for integrating the spiritual depth of Zen Buddhism and Neoplatonism . By merging the contemplative traditions of the East and West, Zen Neoplatonism aims to foster a profound relationship with Ultimate Reality and address contemporary existential challenges. The Advent of the Sacred Vervaeke begins by highlighting what he calls the “Advent of the Sacred,” a resurgence in interest around the concept of the sacred and how humans relate to Ultimate Reality. This interest stems from a deep need to find meaning in a time when traditional systems of belief are in decline. He proposes Zen Neoplatonism as a way to engage with this emerging sacredness by creating a dialogue between Zen and Neoplatonism. These two tradit...
Read more