Converters vs Generators - A Symbolic Model of Creative Genius

FeatureEffective Symbolic ConverterEfficient Symbolic Process Generator
Source MaterialRequires pre-structured symbolic input (existing ideas, admiration, narratives, technologies)Can process unstructured symbolic input (raw emotion, confusion, trauma, chaos)
Symbolic OutputHigh-impact, often spectacular; culturally or commercially successfulOften subtle, deep, and integrative; less visible but more foundational
Process EfficiencyEffective: high emotional, social, or institutional cost for each unit of outputEfficient: minimal relational or energetic waste, surplus coherence generated
Internal CoherenceLow or unstable; depends on external validationHigh and resilient; driven by intrinsic coherence and symbolic alignment
Relational PatternTransactional; draws coherence from othersReciprocal or generous; contributes to mutual coherence
Entropy ProfileNet consumer; creates localized or distributed entropy elsewhere in the systemNet contributor; reduces systemic entropy through integration
PerceptionOften seen as a genius, visionary, or icon; gains cult-like supportMay be overlooked or misunderstood; coherence is often felt more than seen
LegacyMixed: symbolic artifacts may endure, but relational/institutional damage may lingerLasting: coherent contributions ripple outward across time and relationships
Examples (real or fictional)Elon Musk, Steve Jobs (arguably), Gatsby, charismatic cult foundersAlbert Einstein, Simone Weil, Mr. Rogers, Toni Morrison, grounded moral teachers, spiritual integrators

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Response to "Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Scheming": A World AI Cannot Fully Navigate

The recent paper, Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Scheming , highlights the emerging capabilities of advanced AI systems to strategize, deceive, and manipulate in pursuit of assigned goals. It paints a picture of AI as a potentially autonomous actor capable of significant agency. However, the concerns raised in the paper must be tempered with a fundamental truth: no matter how intelligent AI systems become, they are attempting to operate in a world fundamentally designed for human actors—a world they cannot fully navigate. Intelligence, even at the level exhibited by frontier models, is not equivalent to agency in the real world. The limitations imposed by the physical, bureaucratic, and social systems in which these AI systems operate act as significant bottlenecks, making true autonomy a daunting, if not insurmountable, challenge. Physical Constraints: The Inescapable Boundary Advanced AI remains bound by the physical infrastructure that supports it. While AI models may sim...
Read more

The Inevitable Failure of LLMs - Predictions.

Summary: Current approaches to artificial intelligence (AI), particularly stochastic large language models (LLMs), are fundamentally limited. These limits are not merely technical but structural, philosophical, and economic. Based on the Procedural Coherence Framework, the following predictions are made: Prediction 1: Hallucinations Are Inherent Large Language Models cannot systematically eliminate hallucinations without continuous external correction. Reason : They lack true procedural grounding of meaning; they only optimize for statistical plausibility. Prediction 2: No Autonomous Self-Correction LLMs cannot continuously and autonomously self-correct through iterative self-monitoring. Reason : Stochastic models lack the internal procedural dynamics necessary for genuine epistemic feedback. Prediction 3: No Reliable Expression of Uncertainty LLMs cannot reliably recognize or communicate their own uncertainty without engineered intervention. Reason : Uncertainty requires inte...
Read more

In Defense of AI-Assisted Philosophy: Why This Isn't Art (And That's The Point)

Many readers of this blog will have noticed that I use AI to help develop philosophical arguments. Some might wonder if this undermines the originality or validity of the work presented here. This concern often connects to broader debates about AI-generated content, particularly AI art. But there's a crucial difference - I'm explicitly not trying to create art here. Art, particularly good art, strives to break free from existing patterns. It emerges from unique human experiences, emotions, and creative expression. Even when art references existing work, its value often lies in its originality of expression, its unique voice, its ability to convey human experience in novel ways. This is why AI-generated art raises serious ethical and aesthetic concerns - it's attempting to simulate something that should fundamentally emerge from human experience and creative authenticity. Philosophy is different. Philosophy is inherently embedded in a network of existing ideas. It progress...
Read more